Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: The sensitivity of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for detecting axillary lymph node (ALN) metastases in breast cancer is reported to be low. Several studies have shown, however, that dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET imaging provides improved accuracy in the diagnosis of certain primary tumours when compared with single-scan imaging. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the use of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT scans could improve the diagnostic accuracy of ALN metastasis in breast cancer. Method: The study included 171 breast cancer patients who underwent pre-operative 18F-FDG PET/CT scans at 2 time-points, the first at 1 h after radiotracer injection and the second 3 h after injection. Where 18F-FDG uptake was in the ALN perceptibly increased, the maximum standardised uptake values for both time-points (SUVmax1 and SUVmax2) and the retention index (RI) were calculated. Correlation between the PET/CT results and post-operative histological results was assessed. Results: The performance of 1 h and 3 h PET/CT scans was equal, with sensitivity 60.3% and specificity 84.7%, in detecting ALN metastasis. Out of 171 patients, 60 had ALNs with increased 18F-FDG uptake on 1 h or 3 h images. There was no significant difference in RI between the metastatic ALN-positive group and the node-negative group. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for SUVmax1 was 0.90 (p<0.001) and 0.87 for SUVmax2 (p<0.001). Conclusion: Dual time-point imaging did not improve the overall performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting ALN metastasis in breast cancer patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: