A thorough study has been made of the ephedrine-methacrylic acid (MAA) system for molecular imprinting, involving NMR studies of the pre-polymerisation equilibria, modelling and HPLC enantioseparations with different mobile phases. When dimerisation of MAA is accounted for, NMR titrations demonstrate there is a very strong ('stoichiometric', K approximately 10000 M(-1)) interaction between ephedrine and a single MAA monomer. Polymers prepared with a 1:1 monomer:template ratio are capable of enantioseparation, indicating, in combination with the NMR results, that the 1:1 interaction probably involves the carboxylic acid acting as a chelating monomer, forming hydrogen bonds to both the template amine and hydroxyl moieties. Higher monomer:template ratios cause further changes in the NMR signals, suggesting at least one further MAA can interact with the amine group, with a weaker association constant (K approximately 80 M(-1)). Polymers prepared with a 4:1 monomer:template ratio are thus proposed to contain a mixture of 1-monomer binding sites and 2-monomer binding sites, the latter being of enhanced acidity. In HPLC, better results are obtained with the 4:1 polymer using acetic acid as a modifier, while better results are obtained for the 1:1 polymer using butylamine as a modifier. We propose a model whereby acetic acid exerts its effect by reducing binding to the 1-monomer sites, while butylamine works largely through blocking the most acidic, 2-monomer sites. For preparative chromatography we suggest the 1:1 polymer, with a larger population of weaker but more uniform binding sites, is most promising.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ansell et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: