The purpose of this study was to compare the detection rate of root canal orifices by three different methods: naked eye, with surgical loupes, and under a microscope. Two undergraduate dental students located the orifices of 260 teeth by using the above-mentioned methods. Then, India ink was injected into the pulp chamber and all teeth were cleared to determine the actual number of the orifices. There was a significant difference in the detection rate among the three methods (p < 0.01, chi-square test); the microscopic method could more accurately detect orifices than the others could. Surgical loupes were relatively ineffective compared with the microscopic method for detecting orifices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshioka et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: