Key result
The use of a dedicated robot assistant significantly reduced mean operative time compared to non-dedicated assistants (183.2 vs 203.1 minutes) during robotic thyroidectomy.
Why the study?
While the importance of bedside assistants is established in various robotic procedures, the effect of assistants on surgical outcomes in thyroid surgery remains unclear.
Does a dedicated robot assistant reduce operative time in patients undergoing robotic total thyroidectomy?
Case-Control (n=191)
No
Does a dedicated robot assistant reduce operative time in patients undergoing robotic total thyroidectomy?
Absolute Event Rate: 183.2% vs 203.1%
p-value: p=<0.001
The use of a dedicated robot assistant significantly reduces operative time in robotic thyroidectomy, with a learning curve of approximately 36 cases.
Dedicated assistants were associated with shorter operative times in robotic thyroidectomy; hypothesis-generating and leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
The importance of bedside assistants has been well established in various robotic procedures. However, the effect of assistants on the surgical outcomes of thyroid surgery remains unclear. We investigated the effects of a dedicated robot assistant (DRA) in robotic thyroidectomy. We also evaluated the learning curve of the DRA.Between January 2016 and December 2019, 191 patients underwent robotic total thyroidectomy, all of which were performed by a single surgeon. The DRA participated in 93 cases, while non-dedicated assistants (NRAs) helped with 98 cases. Demographic data, pathologic data, operative times, and postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed.Robotic thyroidectomy was successful in all 191 patients, and none required conversion to the conventional open procedure. Mean operative time was shorter in the DRA group than in the NRA group (183.2 ± 33.6 minutes vs 203.1 ± 37.9 minutes; P < .001). There were no significant differences in terms of sex distribution, age, preoperative serum thyroid stimulating hormone level, or pathologic characteristics between the groups. Cumulative summation analysis showed that it took 36 cases for the DRA to significantly reduce operative time. Mean operative time decreased significantly in the subgroup including the 37th to the 93rd DRA cases compared with the subgroup including only the first 36 DRA cases (199.7 ± 37.3 minutes vs 172.8 ± 26.4 minutes; P < .001). NRA group showed no definite decrease of operation time, which indicated that the NRAs did not significantly deviate from the mean performance.Increased experience of the bedside assistant reduced operative times in the robotic thyroidectomy. Assistant training should be considered as a component of robotic surgery training programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hyungju Kwon (2020) conducted a case-control in Robotic total thyroidectomy (n=191). Dedicated robot assistant vs. Non-dedicated robot assistants was evaluated on Operative time (p=<0.001). The use of a dedicated robot assistant significantly reduced mean operative time compared to non-dedicated assistants (183.2 vs 203.1 minutes) during robotic thyroidectomy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: