Key result
Psychological stress elicited phasic cardiac reactivity where between-subjects correlations negated the law of initial value, whereas within-subjects correlations were consistent with it.
Observational
Individual differences in psychologically-elicited phasic cardiac reactivity negate between-subjects predictions of the law of initial value, highlighting the need to distinguish between- and within-subjects formulations.
Distinguishing within- from between-subjects cardiac reactivity may refine stress study design; leaves open clinical relevance of the law of initial value.
The validity of the law of initial value (LIV), which predicts relationships between prestimulus level and phasic response, was evaluated for two cardiac measures, heart rate (HR) and electrocardiographic T‐wave amplitude (TWA). HR acceleration and TWA attenuation were produced in undergraduates by the performance of the backward digit span task. The between‐subjects correlations of prestimulus level with the magnitude of the phasic responses were significant, with signs opposite to that which would be predicted by the LIV. The within‐subjects prestimulus level‐phasic response correlations, however, were consistent with the LIV. It appears that individual differences in psychologically‐elicited phasic cardiac reactivity negate LIV predictions. These results emphasize the importance of sharply distinguishing the between‐ vs. within‐subjects formulations of the LIV, and are contrary to recent psychophysiology textbook accounts of the prestimulus level‐phasic response relationship for cardiac variables.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scher et al. (1985) reported an observational. Psychological stress (backward digit span task) was evaluated on Relationship between prestimulus level and phasic response for heart rate and T-wave amplitude. Psychological stress elicited phasic cardiac reactivity where between-subjects correlations negated the law of initial value, whereas within-subjects correlations were consistent with it.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: