Clinical features and follow‐up results of pulsating polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy treated with photodynamic therapy

PURPOSE: To report on the clinical course of pulsating polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) treated with photodynamic therapy (PDT). METHODS: A total of 63 eyes of 58 consecutive patients diagnosed with PCV, treated with PDT and followed up for at least 6months were enrolled. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fluorescein angiography and high-speed indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (HRA) were performed. RESULTS: Of the 63 PCV eyes, 14 eyes (22.2%) of 14 patients were classified as having pulsating PCV. The mean age of pulsating PCV patients was 60.6±7.0years (48-69years), which was younger than non-pulsating PCV patients (65.7years, p=0.035). The mean follow-up period was 23.9±10.7months, and PDT was administered 1.6±0.9 times to pulsating PCV patients. The mean logMAR BCVAs were 0.85±0.47 at presentation and 0.71±0.52 at final examination. Extensive haemorrhagic events were more common in pulsating than in non-pulsating PCV patients (57.1% versus 26.5%, p=0.032). However, the risk of haemorrhage within 3months of PDT was similar for both pulsating PCV and the remaining patients (14.3% versus 20%, p=0.723). CONCLUSION: Pulsating PCV showed distinctive features including a relatively younger patient age at presentation, and a haemorrhagic tendency (especially extensive). However, the use of PDT did not directly increase the risk of haemorrhage in pulsating PCV patients.