Intraspecific variation in plant toxins at different spatial scales can influence foraging decisions by wild herbivores. In order to investigate plant associational defences in relation to spatial scale, we performed an experiment with fallow deer encountering 2 patches of low- and high-tannin hazel branches. One patch was good, consisting of 7 low- and 1 high-tannin branch, and the other bad, with 1 low- and 7 high-tannin branches. We kept the between-patch spatial scale constant and varied the within-patch spatial scale: the branches in a patch were either spread out or close together in a bundle. When the branches were spread out, the deer showed a clear preference for low-tannin branches in both patches and consumed similar amounts from low-tannin branches in the good and the bad patch, which means that there was no associational defence. In contrast, when the branches instead were together in a bundle, within-patch selectivity decreased and between-patch selectivity increased, and the low-tannin branches in the bad patch were less eaten than the low-tannin branches in the good patch, which corresponds to associational defence. We conclude that small inter-plant distances can be crucial for the operation of plant associational defences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bergvall et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: