Key result
Aortic valve replacement with the Freedom SOLO stentless bioprosthesis in extensive aortic endocarditis yielded 15.2% early mortality and 59.1% overall survival at 10 years.
Why the study?
What are the early and long-term outcomes of using the Freedom SOLO stentless bioprosthesis in patients with extensive aortic endocarditis?
Cohort (n=59)
Yes
What are the early and long-term outcomes of using the Freedom SOLO stentless bioprosthesis in patients with extensive aortic endocarditis?
The Freedom SOLO stentless bioprosthesis provides a viable option for aortic valve replacement in extensive aortic endocarditis, with acceptable long-term survival and low rates of endocarditis recurrence despite high early mortality.
May support FS prosthesis in extensive aortic endocarditis; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: The Freedom SOLO (FS) stentless bovine-pericardial prosthesis with a supra-annular implantation technique can be a viable option for patients with endocarditic annular destruction. We assessed early- and long-term outcomes following the use of this prosthesis in extensive aortic valve endocarditis. METHODS: From 2006 to 2016, 59 patients with extensive aortic endocarditis underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) with FS (cumulative follow-up 263 patients-years) in three European centers; all patients presented annular tissue infection, while 54.3% of patients had annular abscess. RESULTS: Mean age was 66 ± 11 years and mean EuroSCORE I was 30.3% (standard deviation: 24.1%). In our series, 30.5% of patients had prosthetic valve endocarditis. Early mortality was 15.2% (nine patients). Estimated overall survival at 5 and 10 years was 68.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62.8-75.0%) and 59.1% (95% CI: 66.8-81.2%), respectively. At 10-year survival, freedom from valve-related death was 83.7% (95% CI: 80.9-86.5%). No structural valve deterioration was reported in this series. Five patients (8.5%) had recurrent endocarditis during follow-up and two of them underwent reoperation. Survival freedom from reoperation and endocarditis at 10-year follow-up was 88.0% (CI: 80.4-95.6%) and 86.7% (CI: 80.5-92.9%), respectively. CONCLUSION: FS stentless bioprosthesis is a valuable and simple option to achieve AVR in patients with extensive aortic annulus endocarditis. Although in this group of complex patients, early mortality remains considerably high, late survival outcomes are comparable to the more technically demanding homografts and conventional stentless bioprostheses, with low rates of endocarditis recurrence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Repossini et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Extensive aortic valve endocarditis (n=59). Freedom SOLO stentless bioprosthesis was evaluated on Overall survival at 10 years (95% CI 66.8-81.2). Aortic valve replacement with the Freedom SOLO stentless bioprosthesis in extensive aortic endocarditis yielded 15.2% early mortality and 59.1% overall survival at 10 years.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: