Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The effect of cross relaxation on the third-order nonlinear susceptibility, χ(3) (−ω2, ω1, −ω1, ω2), describing polarization spectroscopy experiments is calculated with a density matrix formalism. By using a model of inhomogeneously broadened two-level systems with a reservoir state and allowing for cross relaxation within the inhomogeneous line, we find that both the ratio of the maximum signal at ω1 = ω2 to the background and the broad component resembling the absorption band depend on the cross-relaxation rate. Also, one additional component with a characteristic width of the order of the spectral-diffusion rate Γ3 is expected to appear, depending on the value of this parameter. Furthermore, we estimate from published data [ Phys. Rev. A17, 1439 ( 1978)] the product of the transverse-relaxation time times the cross-relaxation time T2T3 to be 0.014 psec2 for cyanine dye and 0.0009 psec2 for malachite green oxalate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
F. García–Golding (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: