Key result
Dipyridamole-induced headache was associated with a lower 2.5-year risk of recurrent stroke compared to no headache (8.2% vs 9.4%; HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73-0.98; P=0.03).
Why the study?
Does dipyridamole-induced headache predict reduced recurrent stroke risk in patients receiving secondary prevention for ischaemic stroke?
Observational (n=26,934)
Does dipyridamole-induced headache predict reduced recurrent stroke risk in patients receiving secondary prevention for ischaemic stroke?
Hazard Ratio: 0.85 (95% CI 0.73–0.98)
Absolute Event Rate: 8.2% vs 9.4%
p-value: p=0.03
Dipyridamole-induced headache may serve as a clinical marker for better cerebrovascular function and lower risk of recurrent stroke in patients on secondary prevention.
Should not yet change secondary prevention; leaves open headache as a marker of cerebrovascular resilience or treatment response.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our objective was to investigate the association between recurrent stroke risk and headache induced by extended-release dipyridamole (ER-DP) when administered alone or with low-dose aspirin (ASA+ER-DP). METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data on recurrent stroke risk and headache as an adverse event or reason for treatment discontinuation from the PRoFESS (N = 20,332) and ESPS2 (N = 6602) trials. Hazard ratios (HRs) for recurrent stroke were calculated using the Cox model. RESULTS: In PRoFESS, the 2.5-year recurrent stroke risk in patients receiving ASA+ER-DP was 8.2% in those with headache within 7 days of starting treatment and 9.4% in those without [HR 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-0.98; P = 0.03]. Recurrent stroke risk was 5.0% in patients who discontinued ASA+ER-DP due to headache by day 90 versus 9.2% in those who did not (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.35-0.77; P = 0.001). No such difference was observed in clopidogrel-treated patients. In ESPS2, risk of recurrent stroke was 6.2% in patients who discontinued ASA+ER-DP due to headache by day 90 versus 9.8% in patients who did not (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.31-1.27; P = 0.19) and 7.3% in patients who discontinued ER-DP due to headache by day 90 versus 13.2% in those who did not (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.27-1.04; P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Patients taking ASA+ER-DP in PRoFESS who developed headache had significantly reduced stroke recurrence risk versus those without headache. Similar (non-significant) findings for ASA+ER-DP and ER-DP in ESPS2 suggest that dipyridamole-induced headache may reflect better cerebrovascular function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davidai et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Ischaemic stroke (n=26,934). Dipyridamole-induced headache vs. No headache was evaluated on Recurrent stroke (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73-0.98, p=0.03). Dipyridamole-induced headache was associated with a lower 2.5-year risk of recurrent stroke compared to no headache (8.2% vs 9.4%; HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73-0.98; P=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: