Why the study?
Patients with AF frequently experience multimorbidity, but cluster analysis to classify phenotypic subgroups had not yet been applied to South Asian AF patients.
Does adherence to the Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway reduce mortality and MACE in South Asian patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=3,348)
Yes
Does adherence to the Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway reduce mortality and MACE in South Asian patients with atrial fibrillation?
In South Asian patients with atrial fibrillation, adherence to the ABC pathway is low but is significantly associated with reduced all-cause mortality and MACE across various phenotypic clusters.
Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently experience multimorbidity. Cluster analysis, a machine learning method for classifying patients with similar phenotypes, has not yet been used in South Asian AF patients. Methods: The Kerala Atrial Fibrillation Registry is a prospective multicentre cohort study in Kerala, India, and the largest prospective AF registry in South Asia. Hierarchical clustering was used to identify different phenotypic clusters. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and composite bleeding events within one-year follow-up. Five clusters were identified. Cluster 1: patients aged ≤65 years with rheumatic conditions; Cluster 2: patients aged >65 years with multi-comorbidities, suggestive of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome; Cluster 3: patients aged ≤65 years with fewer comorbidities; Cluster 4: heart failure patients with multiple comorbidities; Cluster 5: male patients with lifestyle-related risk factors. Cluster 1, 2 and 4 had significantly higher MACE risk compared to Cluster 3 (Cluster 1: OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.08-1.71; Cluster 2: OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.42-2.25; Cluster 4: OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.31-2.36). The results for other outcomes were similar. Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway in the whole cohort was low (10.1%), especially in Cluster 4 (1.9%). Overall adherence to the ABC pathway was associated with reduced all-cause mortality (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.15-0.46) and MACE (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.31-0.46), similar trends were evident in different clusters. Interpretation: Cluster analysis identified distinct phenotypes with implications for outcomes. There was poor ABC pathway adherence overall, but adherence to such integrated care was associated with improved outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=3,348). Adherence to the Atrial Fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway vs. Non-adherence to the ABC pathway was evaluated on All-cause mortality (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.15-0.46, p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: