Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: This pilot study aimed to evaluate the amino acid tracer F-FACBC with simultaneous PET/MRI in diagnostic assessment and neurosurgery of gliomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven patients with suspected primary or recurrent low- or high-grade glioma received an F-FACBC PET/MRI examination before surgery. PET and MRI were used for diagnostic assessment, and for guiding tumor resection and histopathological tissue sampling. PET uptake, tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs), time-activity curves, as well as PET and MRI tumor volumes were evaluated. The sensitivities of lesion detection and to detect glioma tissue were calculated for PET, MRI, and combined PET/MRI with histopathology (biopsies for final diagnosis and additional image-localized biopsies) as reference. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity for lesion detection was 54.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.4-83.3) for PET, 45.5% (95% CI, 16.7-76.6) for contrast-enhanced MRI (MRICE), and 100% (95% CI, 71.5-100.0) for combined PET/MRI, with a significant difference between MRICE and combined PET/MRI (P = 0.031). TBRs increased with tumor grade (P = 0.004) and were stable from 10 minutes post injection. PET tumor volumes enclosed most of the MRICE volumes (>98%) and were generally larger (1.5-2.8 times) than the MRICE volumes. Based on image-localized biopsies, combined PET/MRI demonstrated higher concurrence with malignant findings at histopathology (89.5%) than MRICE (26.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Low- versus high-grade glioma differentiation may be possible with F-FACBC using TBR. F-FACBC PET/MRI outperformed MRICE in lesion detection and in detection of glioma tissue. More research is required to evaluate F-FACBC properties, especially in grade II and III tumors, and for different subtypes of gliomas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karlberg et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: