Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Driven by the increasing energy density of battery energy storage systems, immersion cooling (IC) has emerged as a promising approach for mitigating thermal runaway (TR) hazards. In this study, overcharge-induced TR tests were conducted on commercial 314 Ah lithium iron phosphate batteries in an accelerating rate calorimeter to compare their thermal, pressure, mass loss, and gas venting responses under air cooling (AC) and static ester-based immersion cooling. For the two cells tested, internal short circuit onset occurred at 1150 s under AC and 1377 s under IC, while TR was triggered at 1232 and 1404 s, respectively. The peak surface temperature decreased from 422.4 °C under AC to 302.4 °C under IC, and the maximum surface temperature difference was reduced by approximately 31%. The maximum chamber pressure rise rate decreased from 3.12 to 1.68 kPa/s, although a higher late-stage cumulative pressure was observed under IC within the sealed ARC chamber. Battery mass loss decreased from 1014.2 g (18.27%) under AC to 845.2 g (15.24%) under IC. In addition, the CO2 fraction in the post-cooling gas mixture increased from 30.4% to 38.4%, while the H2 fraction decreased from 43.6% to 36.9%. Based on the modified Le Chatelier calculation, the estimated lower explosive limit increased from 6.16% to 7.18%, suggesting lower composition-based ignitability under the adopted assumptions. Overall, the tested static ester-based immersion cooling configuration delayed TR evolution, reduced peak thermal response and mass loss, and moderated the transient pressure rise under the present experimental conditions. These findings provide experimental reference data for the thermal-safety design of large-capacity battery energy storage systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: