Key result
Selective iNOS inhibition with 1400W stabilized blood pressure (88 vs 67 mmHg, P<0.05) without aggravating lactate acidosis or deteriorating mucosal oxygenation in a rat model of endotoxic shock.
Why the study?
Does selective iNOS inhibition improve hemodynamics and microcirculation compared to non-selective NOS inhibition or norepinephrine in a rat model of endotoxic shock?
Population
Male Wistar rats in a model of endotoxic shock, n=24.
Comparison
Selective iNOS inhibitor 1400W, non-selective… vs Saline.
Design
Preclinical, Randomized into four different groups
Follow-up
60 minutes after infusion
Authors
Loading...
Stabilizes hemodynamics without microcirculatory harm in rats; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice in human sepsis.
RCT (n=24)
randomized
Does selective iNOS inhibition improve hemodynamics and microcirculation compared to non-selective NOS inhibition or norepinephrine in a rat model of endotoxic shock?
Absolute Event Rate: 88% vs 67%
p-value: p=<0.05
In a rat model of endotoxic shock, selective iNOS inhibition with 1400W stabilized blood pressure without the deleterious microcirculatory effects seen with norepinephrine or non-selective NOS inhibition.
Pullamsetti et al. (2006) conducted an RCT in Endotoxic shock (n=24). 1400W (selective iNOS inhibitor) vs. Saline (hypotensive baseline) and norepinephrine was evaluated on Blood pressure at 60 minutes after injection (p=<0.05). Selective iNOS inhibition with 1400W stabilized blood pressure (88 vs 67 mmHg, P<0.05) without aggravating lactate acidosis or deteriorating mucosal oxygenation in a rat model of endotoxic shock.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: