Key result
Proximal pulmonary embolism location was associated with the presence of co-existing deep venous thrombosis, whereas none of the 10 patients with exclusively peripheral PE had co-existing DVT.
Why the study?
In roughly half of patients with PE, DVT is not evident at diagnosis, and the underlying factors and origin of PE in these patients are not completely understood.
Is the presence of co-existing DVT associated with specific PE locations, extensions, or biomarker profiles in patients with pulmonary embolism?
Observational (n=63)
Is the presence of co-existing DVT associated with specific PE locations, extensions, or biomarker profiles in patients with pulmonary embolism?
In patients with pulmonary embolism, the presence of co-existing DVT is strongly associated with a proximal PE location, whereas isolated PE is more likely to be peripheral.
Proximal PE may warrant concurrent DVT screening; leaves open whether peripheral PE can safely omit leg imaging in larger cohorts.
: Multiple studies have shown that in approximately half of individuals with pulmonary embolism (PE), the deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is not evident at the moment of PE diagnosis. The underlying factors and the origin of PE in these patients are not completely understood: missed DVT, embolization of DVT in its entirety, or de-novo PE being possible explanations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in PE patient with or without co-existing DVT. Sixty-three consecutive PE patients were included. Whole leg bilateral Doppler compression ultrasound was performed to all patients. The PE location and extension, C-reactive protein, platelet count, hemostatic markers FV, FVIII, FXIIIa, Fibrinogen, von Willebrand factor antigen, thrombomodulin were assessed. Thorough clinical assessment including echocardiography and pulmonary function tests were performed upon arrival and seven months later. The mean age of the patients was 57 years (SD 17.3) and 33 (52%) were women. Thirty-one patients (49.2%) had co-existing DVT. The presence of DVT was associated with the proximal location of the PE (100%), whereas none of the patients (n = 10) with exclusively peripheral PE had co-existing DVT. The PE extension, the measured hemostatic and inflammatory markers or the patient characteristics did not statistically differ between patients with isolated PE and PE with co-existing DVT. In roughly half of the PE patients no DVT could be detected. The location of the PE was associated with the presence of co-existing DVT. There were no differences in the PE extension, hemostatic markers or in the patient characteristic between patients with isolated PE or PE with co-existing DVT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sane et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Pulmonary embolism (n=63). Proximal pulmonary embolism location vs. Peripheral pulmonary embolism location was evaluated on Presence of co-existing deep venous thrombosis. Proximal pulmonary embolism location was associated with the presence of co-existing deep venous thrombosis, whereas none of the 10 patients with exclusively peripheral PE had co-existing DVT.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: