Induced rat liver S-9 is routinely used for metabolic activation in cytogenetic assays. When a compound gives a positive test result only with rat S-9, the significance for humans should be assessed. To evaluate the use of human S-9, we used sister-chromatid exchanges (SCEs) and chromosome aberrations (Abs) in Chinese hamster ovary cells to test five pro-mutagens, each preferentially activated by a different family of P-450: benzo(a)pyrene (BP), dimethylnitrosamine (DMN), diethylnitrosamine (DEN), aflatoxin B1 (AFB), and 2-acetylaminofluorene (2-AAF). We tested two human S-9 preparations, one from a single liver and a second pooled from two livers known to have good activity for several P-450s. Concentrations and ratios of NADP and isocitrate were adjusted to optimize NADPH generation by the S-9. Abs were scored 20 hr, and SCEs 29-45 hr, after the beginning of a 3 hr treatment. P-450 enzyme activities were generally higher in rat than human S-9. With the single-liver human S-9, increase in SCEs were seen with all chemicals; with both human S-9s, increases in Abs were seen with all chemicals except BP. (The level of P-450 1A1, required for BP activation, is very low in human liver.) Compared with rat S-9, generally higher concentrations of human S-9 and of promutagens were required to see positive results. However, human S-9 effectively activated 2-AAF, whereas neither of the two types of rat S-9 produced Abs with 2-AAF. We also compared rat S-9s induced with Aroclor 1254 or phenobarbital/ beta-naphthoflavone (PB/beta NF). Although there were some differences in P-450 enzyme activities, these did not translate into differences in Abs induction. At low doses of AFB and of BP, PB/beta NF induced S-9 appeared more effective than Aroclor 1254 induced S-9.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: