Key result
Magnetic resonance imaging for stroke volume did not meet interchangeability criteria with thermodilution in pulmonary hypertension patients, with a 2SD bias between 24.1 and 31.1 mL/beat.
Why the study?
Cardiac output is a paramount parameter in pulmonary hypertension, and magnetic resonance imaging can be used to measure it non-invasively.
Does MRI-derived stroke volume agree with thermodilution-derived stroke volume in patients with pulmonary hypertension?
Observational (n=24)
No
Does MRI-derived stroke volume agree with thermodilution-derived stroke volume in patients with pulmonary hypertension?
MRI-derived stroke volume did not meet interchangeability criteria with thermodilution in pulmonary hypertension patients, suggesting potential precision limitations with thermodilution.
MRI SV at six sites lacks agreement with TD in PH; leaves open reliable non-invasive CO assessment.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to measure cardiac output (CO) non-invasively, which is a paramount parameter in pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients. We retrospectively compared stroke volume (SV) obtained with MRI (SVMRI) in six localisations against SV measured with thermodilution (TD) (SVTD) and against each other in 24 patients evaluated in our PH centre using Bland and Altman (BA) agreement analyses, linear correlation, and intraclass correlation (ICC). None of the six tested localisations for SVMRI reached the predetermined criteria for interchangeability with SVTD, with two standard deviations (2SD) of bias between 24.1 mL/beat and 31.1 mL/beat. The SVMRI methods yielded better agreement when compared against each other than the comparison between SVMRI and SVTD, with the best 2SD of bias being 13.8 mL/beat. The inter-observer and intra-observer ICCs for COMRI were excellent (inter-observer ICC between 0.889 and 0.983 and intra-observer ICC between 0.991 and 0.999). We could not confirm the interchangeability of SVMRI with SVTD based on the predetermined interchangeability criteria. The lack of agreement between MRI and TD might be explained because TD is less precise than previously thought. We evaluated a new method to estimate CO through the pulmonary circulation (COp) in PH patients that may be more precise than the previously tested methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crowe et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Pulmonary hypertension (n=24). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for stroke volume vs. Thermodilution (TD) was evaluated on Interchangeability between SVMRI and SVTD (Bland-Altman agreement). Magnetic resonance imaging for stroke volume did not meet interchangeability criteria with thermodilution in pulmonary hypertension patients, with a 2SD bias between 24.1 and 31.1 mL/beat.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: