Why the study?
Do NOACs prevent stroke or systemic embolism compared to VKAs in patients with atrial fibrillation and concomitant valvular heart disease?
Do NOACs prevent stroke or systemic embolism compared to VKAs in patients with atrial fibrillation and concomitant valvular heart disease?
NOACs appear safe and effective in AF patients with mild-to-moderate native valvular disease, but are contraindicated in those with mechanical prosthetic valves where VKAs remain the standard of care.
VKA preferred over rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in rheumatic valve AF; extends RCT evidence beyond nonvalvular populations.
There is a clinically staggering burden of disease stemming from cerebrovascular events, of which a majority are ischemic in nature and many are precipitated by atrial fibrillation (AF). AF can occur in isolation or in association with myocardial or structural heart disease. In the latter case, and when considering health at an international level, congenital and acquired valve-related diseases are frequent contributors to the current pandemic of AF and its clinical impact. Guidelines crafted by the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, European Society of Cardiology and Heart Rhythm Society underscore the use of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) among patients with valvular heart disease, particularly in the presence of concomitant AF, to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke of cardioembolic origin; however, the non-VKAs, also referred to as direct, target-specific or new oral anticoagulants (NOACs), have not been actively studied in this particular population. In fact, each of the new agents is approved in patients with AF not caused by a valve problem. The aim of our review is to carefully examine the available evidence from pivotal phase 3 clinical trials of NOACs and determine how they might perform in patients with AF and concomitant valvular heart disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmad et al. (2016) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease. New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: