We have studied the energetics, atomic, and electronic structure of Na and K point defects, as well as the (Na–Na), (K–K), and (Na–K) dumbbells in CuInSe 2 and CuIn 5 Se 8 solar cell materials by hybrid functional calculations. We found that although Na and K behaves somewhat similar; there is a qualitative difference between the inclusion of Na and K impurities. Namely, Na will be mostly incorporated into CuInSe 2 and CuIn 5 Se 8 either as an interstitial defect coordinated by cations, or two Na impurities will form (Na–Na) dumbbells in the Cu sublattice. In contrast to Na, K impurities are less likely to form interstitial defects. Instead, it is more preferable to accommodate K either as K Cu substitutional defect, or to form (K–K) dumbbells on Cu substitution positions. Our data show that all (Na–Na), (Na–K), and (K–K) dumbbells can form in both CuInSe 2 and CuIn 5 Se 8 . In the Cu-poor CuIn 5 Se 8 material the pristine Cu vacancies act as the most stable sites where Na and K can be inserted. The formation energy of Na-related defects is generally lower than the corresponding K-related defects, which would mean that if a defect site is already occupied by Na, then it is less likely that K is able to substitute Na during the postdeposition treatment. Regarding the electronic structure of the materials, Na and K point defects located in the Cu sublattice do not create deep defect levels in the gap, so they are not detrimental for the solar cell. In contrast, Se-related substitutional defects introduce defect levels in the gap, which act as charge traps, leading to severe degradation of the device efficiency. However, the formation energy of these Se-related defects are high so that they should have a low concentration in the material.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghorbani et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: