Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational modeling reveals distinct isotopic signatures from diverse pyroxenites during divergent mantle melting, indicating mantle heterogeneity and complex melt transport globally.
We present computational modeling outcomes for bilithologic (peridotite and pyroxenite) mantle melting in divergent environments, considering equilibrium and disequilibrium porous flow melting of 0–50 % pyroxenite in thermal equilibrium with peridotite, potential temperatures of 1300 and 1400 °C, upwelling rates from 1–50 cm yr−1, maximum porosities of 0.1–2.0 %, and four compositions that span pyroxenite melting behavior. Basalt-like pyroxenites (G2) uniquely produce low (226Ra/230Th) and (231Pa/235U) with high (230Th/238U), but quantities greater than ~10 % produce anomalously thick crust, restricting their global abundance. Silica-deficient pyroxenite (M7-16 and MIX1G) melts are more moderate, but require chemical re-equilibration during transport to resemble global basalts, while hybrid lithologies (KG1) produce melts similar to those of peridotites. Uranium-series disequilibria in partial melts can also be decoupled from trace elements by radioactive decay in two-dimensional regimes. The mantle must thus contain multiple types of pyroxenite on a global scale, with melts traveling by complex networks and experiencing heterogeneous extents of chemical re-equilibration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elkins et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: