Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two preliminary, six-month long global WindSat vector wind datasets are validated using buoys and QuikSCAT measurements. Buoy comparisons yield speed and direction root mean square accuracies of 1.4 m/s and 25/spl deg/ for the "NESDIS0" product and 1.3 m/s and 23/spl deg/ for the more recently produced "B1" product from the Naval Research Laboratory. WindSat along- and across-wind random component errors of 0.7-1.0 and 2.6-2.8 m/s (respectively) are larger than those calculated for QuikSCAT in the same period. Global WindSat-QuikSCAT comparisons generally confirmed the buoy analyses. While simple rain flags based directly on WindSat brightness temperature measurements alone are shown to overflag for rain systematically, the advanced "Environmental Data Record" rain flag in the B1 product matches well with Special Sensor Microwave/Imager rain detection frequency and preserves the accuracy of the unflagged vector wind measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Freilich et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: