Key result
Percutaneous coronary intervention was successful in 94% of patients with end-stage liver disease and coronary artery disease, with no in-hospital or 30-day deaths or myocardial infarctions.
Why the study?
Is percutaneous coronary intervention feasible and safe in patients with end-stage liver disease and hemodynamically significant CAD referred for liver transplantation?
Observational (n=16)
Is percutaneous coronary intervention feasible and safe in patients with end-stage liver disease and hemodynamically significant CAD referred for liver transplantation?
PCI appears feasible and safe in patients with end-stage liver disease and significant CAD, potentially allowing them to safely proceed with liver transplantation.
May support PCI feasibility in ESLD with CAD; hypothesis-generating case report data require prospective validation before practice change.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has traditionally not been an option for patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) and coronary artery disease (CAD). This retrospective study was designed to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of PCI in liver transplant candidates. Patients with ESLD and hemodynamically significant CAD who were otherwise deemed to be acceptable candidates for liver transplantation underwent PCI. The procedural success rates, mortality and myocardial infarction rates, and bleeding outcomes were examined. Sixteen patients with ESLD underwent PCI: 15 with bare-metal stents (1.3 stents per patient on average) and 1 with balloon angioplasty alone. The median diameter stenosis per lesion was 80%, the median platelet count was 68 × 10(9) /L, the median international normalized ratio was 1.3, and the median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 13. PCI was successful in 94% of the patients. One patient had a suboptimal residual stenosis of 50% after stenting. There were no in-hospital or 30-day deaths or myocardial infarctions, and no patients developed hematomas. One patient required a 1-U platelet transfusion, and another required 1 U of packed red blood cells. All patients remained clinically stable 1 month after PCI. Nine of the 16 patients were listed for liver transplantation, and 3 patients underwent liver transplantation. In conclusion, we have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of PCI in a small cohort of patients with ESLD and hemodynamically significant CAD, the majority of whom had significant thrombocytopenia. Larger studies are required to determine whether PCI is an effective treatment strategy for patients with ESLD and hemodynamically significant CAD who otherwise would not be candidates for liver transplantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Azarbal et al. (2011) conducted an observational in End-stage liver disease and coronary artery disease (n=16). Percutaneous coronary intervention was evaluated on Procedural success. Percutaneous coronary intervention was successful in 94% of patients with end-stage liver disease and coronary artery disease, with no in-hospital or 30-day deaths or myocardial infarctions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: