Key result
A shorter dobutamine infusion protocol for stress echocardiography was discussed, but no quantitative results were reported in the abstract.
Why the study?
Does a shorter dobutamine infusion protocol maintain diagnostic accuracy compared to the classic protocol in patients undergoing stress echocardiography?
Does a shorter dobutamine infusion protocol maintain diagnostic accuracy compared to the classic protocol in patients undergoing stress echocardiography?
A shorter dobutamine infusion protocol for stress echocardiography could improve feasibility and cost-effectiveness if diagnostic accuracy is maintained.
Shorter dobutamine protocol discussed without metrics; hypothesis-generating and should not change stress echocardiography practice.
urrently, a transthoracic echocardiographic examination is routinely included in the assessment of the majority of patients with cardiac disease. Other examinations are also demanded every day from the echocardiography laboratory. Of these, stress echocardiography is particularly time consuming. Shortening the time of infusion of a drug would increase the feasibility and the cost effectiveness of stress echocardiography, 1 provided of course that the diagnostic accuracy achieved using the classic drug infusion protocol is maintained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. Alberto San Román (2003) studied Cardiac disease. Shorter dobutamine infusion protocol vs. Classic drug infusion protocol was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy. A shorter dobutamine infusion protocol for stress echocardiography was discussed, but no quantitative results were reported in the abstract.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: