Key result
D-Ribose improved contractile responses to low-dose dobutamine in viable myocardium with resting dysfunction compared to placebo (41 vs. 19 segments, p=0.006), but did not significantly reduce stress-induced ischemia.
Why the study?
Does D-ribose improve the contractile response and reduce stress-induced ischemia during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy?
RCT (n=28)
Double-blind
Randomized
No
Does D-ribose improve the contractile response and reduce stress-induced ischemia during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy?
Intravenous D-Ribose improves the contractile response to low-dose dobutamine in viable myocardium with resting dysfunction but does not significantly reduce the frequency of stress-induced wall motion abnormalities at high doses.
May aid viability detection on low-dose dobutamine echocardiography; extends metabolic modulation data in ischemic cardiomyopathy.
D-Ribose, a pentose sugar, has shown to improve myocardial high-energy phosphate stores depleted by ischemia. This study investigated the ability of D-Ribose with low dose dobutamine to improve the contractile response of viable myocardium to dobutamine and to assess the efficacy of D-ribose in reducing stress-induced ischemia. Twenty-six patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy completed a two-day, randomized, double blind crossover trial comparing the effects of D-Ribose and placebo on regional wall motion. On the first study day, either D-Ribose or placebo was infused for 4.5 hours. Low (5 and 10 micro/kg/min) and subsequently, high (up to 50 micro/kg/min) dose dobutamine echocardiography was then performed. On the second study day, patients crossed over to the alternative article for a similar 4.5 hours infusion time period and underwent a similar evaluation. The wall motion response during low dose dobutamine was the same with D-Ribose and placebo in 77% of segments (203/263, Kappa = 0.37). In segments with discordant responses, more segments improved with D-Ribose than with placebo (41 vs. 19 segments, p = 0.006). With high dose dobutamine infusion, the wall motion response (ischemia vs. no ischemia) was the same with D-Ribose and placebo in 83% of interpretable segments (301/363, kappa = 0.244). In segments with discordant responses, there were more ischemic segments with placebo compared to D-Ribose (36 vs. 26, p = 0.253). Nineteen patients developed ischemia during the dobutamine and placebo infusion and 13 patients had ischemia during dobutamine and D-ribose infusion (p = 0.109). D-Ribose improved contractile responses to dobutamine in viable myocardium with resting dysfunction but had no significant effect in reducing the frequency of stress-induced wall motion abnormalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sawada et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in Ischemic cardiomyopathy (n=28). D-Ribose vs. Placebo was evaluated on Improvement in regional wall motion during low dose dobutamine in segments with discordant responses (p=0.006). D-Ribose improved contractile responses to low-dose dobutamine in viable myocardium with resting dysfunction compared to placebo (41 vs. 19 segments, p=0.006), but did not significantly reduce stress-induced ischemia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: