Studies on the effect of parameter estimation on control-chart performance have mostly focused on the marginal (unconditional) run length (RL) distribution and some associated characteristics. However, once process parameters are estimated from an in-control (IC) reference sample, the RL follows its conditional distribution given the parameter estimates. With this in mind, our focus is the conditional RL distribution of the S and S2 charts. First, we concentrate on the IC conditional RL distribution, which is geometric with parameter (probability of success) αTRUE, the unknown attained false-alarm probability, given the estimate of the process standard deviation. We obtain and examine the distribution of αTRUE as a function of the number and the size of the reference samples. We consider a one-sided prediction interval for αTRUE and, for several sample sizes, obtain the minimum number of reference sample observations that guarantees, with a specified probability, that αTRUE will not exceed the nominal value of the false-alarm probability, αNOM, by more than a prespecified percentage. Next, we argue that (and demonstrate why), in the particular case of S and S2 charts, there is no practical need of a similar analysis of the effects of parameter estimation on their out-of-control performance, and draw some conclusions in terms of guidance for the user.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Epprecht et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: