Key result
Bovine Pericardium Organic Valvular Bioprosthesis implants had late valve-related adverse event rates < 2 × objective performance criteria, with 1-year survival of 95.1% (aortic) and 92.7% (mitral).
Why the study?
Actual data on the safety, effectiveness, and hemodynamic performance of the Bovine Pericardium Organic Valvular Bioprosthesis were needed.
Is the Bovine Pericardium Organic Valvular Bioprosthesis safe and effective in patients with symptomatic, moderate, or severe valve disease?
Observational (n=903)
Yes
Is the Bovine Pericardium Organic Valvular Bioprosthesis safe and effective in patients with symptomatic, moderate, or severe valve disease?
The Bovine Pericardium Organic Valvular Bioprosthesis meets objective performance criteria for safety and clinical efficacy at one year follow-up.
BVP meets safety benchmarks in real-world Brazilian practice; leaves open need for randomized trials before guideline changes.
OBJECTIVE: To assess actual data on the safety, effectiveness, and hemodynamic performance of Bovine Pericardium Organic Valvular Bioprosthesis (BVP). METHODS: The BIOPRO Trial is an observational, retrospective, non-comparative, non-randomized, and multicenter study. We collected data from 903 patients with symptomatic, moderate, or severe valve disease who underwent BVP implants in the timeframe from 2013 to 2020 at three Brazilian institutions. Death, valve-related adverse events (AEs), functional recovery, and hemodynamic performance were evaluated at the hospital, at discharge, and six months and one year later. Primary analysis compared late (> 30 days after implant) linearized rates of valve-related AEs, such as thromboembolism, valve thrombosis, major hemorrhage, major paravalvular leak, and endocarditis, following objective performance criteria (OPC). Analysis was performed to include at least 400 valve-years for each valve position (aortic and mitral) for complete comparisons to OPC. Kaplan-Meier survival and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event analyses were also performed. RESULTS: This retrospective study analyzed follow-up data collected from 903 patients (834.2 late patient-years) who have undergone surgery for 455 isolated aortic valve replacement (50.4%), 382 isolated mitral valve replacement (42.3%), and 66 combined valve replacement or other intervention (7.3%). The linearized rates of valve-related AEs were < 2 × OPC. One-year survival rates were 95.1% and 92.7% for aortic and mitral valve replacement, respectively. This study demonstrated an improvement in the New York Heart Association classification from baseline and hemodynamic performance within an expected range. CONCLUSION: According to this analysis, BVP meets world standards for safety and clinical efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rösler et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Symptomatic, moderate, or severe valve disease (n=903). Bovine Pericardium Organic Valvular Bioprosthesis (BVP) vs. Objective performance criteria (OPC) was evaluated on Late (> 30 days after implant) linearized rates of valve-related adverse events. Bovine Pericardium Organic Valvular Bioprosthesis implants had late valve-related adverse event rates < 2 × objective performance criteria, with 1-year survival of 95.1% (aortic) and 92.7% (mitral).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: