Key result
Troponin serves as a key biomarker for monitoring myocardial injury after chemotherapy, evaluating cardioprotective agents, and assessing prognosis in nonmalignant hematologic disorders.
Why the study?
Does troponin measurement help monitor myocardial injury and assess prognosis in hematologic oncology patients?
Does troponin measurement help monitor myocardial injury and assess prognosis in hematologic oncology patients?
Troponin is a valuable biomarker for monitoring chemotherapy-induced myocardial injury and assessing prognosis in various hematologic disorders.
May support troponin monitoring in hematologic oncology; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
In cardiology practice, the standard method of evaluating patients with suspected ischemic myocardial injury is an assay that measures the release of troponin into the bloodstream. In hematologic oncology practice, troponin has been investigated extensively as a measure of myocardial injury after therapy with radiation and anthracyclines and after myeloablative therapies with stem cell replacement. This review describes the current literature on use of troponin for monitoring early and late complications of systemic chemotherapy. The use of troponin to assess the value of cardioprotective agents (used for prevention of chemotherapy-induced myocardial injury) also is reviewed. Because a number of nonmalignant hematologic disorders such as hypereosinophilic syndrome, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, and immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis can affect the heart, the use of the troponin in assessing these patients' prognoses is also covered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morie A. Gertz (2008) conducted a review in Hematologic oncology and nonmalignant hematologic disorders. Troponin monitoring was evaluated. Troponin serves as a key biomarker for monitoring myocardial injury after chemotherapy, evaluating cardioprotective agents, and assessing prognosis in nonmalignant hematologic disorders.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: