Key result
Endovascular aortic repair significantly reduced 30-day mortality compared to open repair in patients aged 40-65 with asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.28-0.57; P<0.00001).
Why the study?
Younger, lower-risk patients with asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms undergoing endovascular aortic repair usually have poorer post-operative outcomes, so this study investigated whether endovascular repair leads to poorer short- and long-term outcomes.
Does endovascular aortic repair improve short- and long-term outcomes compared to open repair in younger patients (40-65 years) with asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms?
Meta-Analysis (n=250,837)
Does endovascular aortic repair improve short- and long-term outcomes compared to open repair in younger patients (40-65 years) with asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms?
Odds Ratio: 0.4 (95% CI 0.28–0.57)
p-value: p=<0.00001
Endovascular aortic repair in younger patients (40-65 years) with asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms is associated with improved short- and long-term survival compared to open repair.
May support EVAR preference for short-term survival in younger AAA patients; leaves open need for RCTs on durability.
Objectives Abdominal aortic aneurysms are conventionally treated by open repair surgery. While endovascular aortic repair improves survival in high-risk patients, younger patients (40–65 years) potentially at lower risk with asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms undergoing endovascular aortic repair usually have poorer post-operative outcomes and require longer term follow-up. In this study, clinical data on younger patients were analyzed to investigate whether endovascular aortic repair leads to poorer short- and long-term outcomes. Methods This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles comparing clinical outcomes in patients aged 40–65 years undergoing open repair or endovascular aortic repair and published between 2000 and 2017. In-hospital mortality, long-term mortality, and post-operative complication data were retrieved from eligible studies and clinical outcomes were compared. Twenty-one retrospective cohort analyses were included, accounting for 250,837 patients (149,051 endovascular aortic repair; 101,786 open repair). Risk ratios were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model. All statistical analyses were performed in Review Manager 5.3. Results Younger patients with asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms undergoing endovascular aortic repair had a significantly reduced 30-day mortality (odds ratio (OR) = 0.40, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.28–0.57; p < 0.00001), long-term mortality (OR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.17–0.82; p = 0.01), incidence of reintervention (OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.34–0.66; p < 0.0001), and incidence of renal failure (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.37–1.82; p < 0.00001). Conclusions Endovascular aortic repair may improve short- and long-term survival and reduce post-operative complications in younger patients with asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wc et al. (2019) conducted a meta-analysis in Asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (n=250,837). Endovascular aortic repair vs. Open repair was evaluated on 30-day mortality (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.28-0.57, p=<0.00001). Endovascular aortic repair significantly reduced 30-day mortality compared to open repair in patients aged 40-65 with asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.28-0.57; P<0.00001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: