Key result
Vascular registry data have been instrumental in evaluating paradigm shifts in abdominal aortic aneurysm management, including the increased use and early survival advantage of endovascular repair.
Why the study?
The management of abdominal aortic aneurysm has undergone extensive changes, and vascular surgical registries have been instrumental in evaluating, monitoring, and understanding outcomes in broad patient populations.
Vascular registries are essential tools for evaluating real-world outcomes, assessing the generalizability of randomized trials, and tracking paradigm shifts such as the widespread adoption of EVAR in AAA management.
Registry data aid AAA management surveillance; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm long-term EVAR durability.
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a relatively common and potentially fatal disease. The management of AAA has undergone extensive changes in the last two decades. High quality vascular surgical registries were established early and have been found to be instrumental in the evaluation and monitoring of these changes, most notably the wide implementation of minimally invasive endovascular surgical technology. Trends over the years showed the increased use of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) over open repair, the decreasing perioperative adverse outcomes and the early survival advantage of EVAR. Also, data from the early EVAR years changed the views on endoleak management and showed the importance of tracking the implementation of new techniques. Registry data complemented the randomized trials performed in aortic surgery by showing the high rate of laparotomy-related reinterventions after open repair. Also, they are an essential tool for the understanding of outcomes in a broad patient population, evaluating the generalizability of findings from randomized trials and analysing changes over time. By using large-scale data over longer periods of time, the importance of centralization of care to high-volume centres was shown, particularly for open repair. Additionally, large-scale databases can offer an opportunity to assess practice and outcomes in patient subgroups (e.g. treatment of AAA in women and the elderly) as well as in rare aortic pathologies. In this review article, we point out the most important paradigm shifts in AAA management based on vascular registry data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guerre et al. (2020) conducted a review in Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) vs. Open repair was evaluated. Vascular registry data have been instrumental in evaluating paradigm shifts in abdominal aortic aneurysm management, including the increased use and early survival advantage of endovascular repair.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: