Key result
The REPRESS model performed better than the LACE score for predicting 30-day readmission risk in a sepsis population.
Why the study?
Traditional readmission risk scores may be suboptimal in patients with sepsis, creating a need to determine variables associated with 30-day readmissions as sepsis survivorship improves.
Does the REPRESS model predict 30-day readmission better than the LACE score in patients with sepsis?
Observational
Does the REPRESS model predict 30-day readmission better than the LACE score in patients with sepsis?
The REPRESS model offers a sepsis-specific tool that outperforms the traditional LACE score for predicting 30-day hospital readmissions.
Hospital 30-day readmissions remain a major quality and cost indicator. Traditional readmission risk scores, such as LACE (length of stay, acuity of admission, Charlson comorbidity index, and emergency department visits), may be suboptimal in special patient populations, such as those with sepsis. As sepsis survivorship improves, there is a need to determine which variables might be associated with a decrease in 30-day readmission. We completed a retrospective analysis reviewing patients with sepsis who had unplanned 30-day readmissions. Multivariate regression analysis was performed for the REadmission PREvention in SepSis (REPRESS) model, which evaluated age, length of stay, Charlson disease count, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score, discharge to a skilled nursing facility, and mobility for predictive significance in hospital readmission. Our REPRESS model performed better when compared with LACE for predicting readmission risk in a sepsis population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grek et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Sepsis. REPRESS model vs. LACE score was evaluated on 30-day readmission risk. The REPRESS model performed better than the LACE score for predicting 30-day readmission risk in a sepsis population.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: