Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Carbon-negative electrified production of methanol (e-MeOH) can play a central role in sustainable chemical manufacturing in the coming years. In this context, CO 2 -based methanol synthesis routes solely based on renewable electricity have been proposed. However, the production route via direct air-captured (DAC) CO 2 and green H 2 from water electrolysis (WE) is not industrially available, and in-depth feasibility studies are needed to determine its viability. By designing a 50 kt y –1 e-MeOH production plant based on DAC-CO 2 and electrolytic H 2, we assess the plant’s performance and economic feasibility against the state-of-the-art industrial manufacturing based on natural gas steam reforming. Absorption-based DAC accounts for the highest capital expenditure (CAPEX) of the plant, whereas the proton-exchange membrane WE drives electricity consumption. The adiabatic reactor for the catalytic CO 2 –H 2 reaction is the least cost-intensive section. Thus, the levelized cost of product of e-MeOH in 2050 is expected to be still 3 times that of the current fossil-based MeOH. However, the overall electrified process is carbon negative by consuming 0.64 kg CO2-eq kg MeOH –1, whereas the conventional process releases a significant amount of greenhouse gases. Technological improvement of the DAC unit could increase the competitiveness of the e-process, together with lower electricity prices. Furthermore, sourcing CO 2 from concentrated streams would cut production costs up to equaling a conventional process penalized with a 183 $ t CO2 –1 carbon tax.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cameli et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: