Objectives To evaluate the performance of screening for all stillbirths and those due to impaired placentation and unexplained or other causes using a combination of maternal factors, fetal biometry and uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA‐PI) at 19–24 weeks' gestation and to compare this performance with that of screening by UtA‐PI alone. Methods This was a prospective screening study of 70 003 singleton pregnancies including 69 735 live births and 268 (0.38%) antepartum stillbirths; 159 (59%) were secondary to impaired placentation and 109 (41%) were due to other or unexplained causes. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to develop a model for prediction of stillbirth based on a combination of maternal factors, fetal biometry and UtA‐PI. Results Combined screening predicted 55% of all stillbirths, including 75% of those due to impaired placentation and 23% of those that were unexplained or due to other causes, at a false‐positive rate of 10%. Within the impaired placentation group, the detection rate of stillbirth < 32 weeks' gestation was higher than that of stillbirth ≥ 37 weeks (88% vs 46%; P < 0.001). The performance of screening by the combined test was superior to that of selecting the high‐risk group on the basis of UtA‐PI > 90th percentile for gestational age, which predicted 48% of all stillbirths, 70% of those due to impaired placentation and 15% of those that were unexplained or due to other causes. Conclusions Second‐trimester screening by a combination of UtA‐PI with maternal factors and fetal biometry can predict a high proportion of stillbirths and, in particular, those that are due to impaired placentation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akolekar et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: