Objectives: Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using coils (LVRC) is a well-known treatment option for severe emphysema. The purpose of this study was to identify quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and clinical parameters associated with positive treatment outcome. Patients and methods: The CT scans, pulmonary function tests (PFT), and 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) data were collected from 72 patients with advanced emphysema prior to and at 3 months after LVRC treatment. The procedure involved placing 10 coils unilaterally. Various QCT parameters were derived using Apollo imaging software (VIDA). Independent predictors of clinically relevant outcome (∆6-MWT ≥ 26 m, ∆FEV 1 ≥ 12%, ∆RV ≥ 10%) were identified through stepwise linear regression analysis. Results: The response outcome for ∆6-MWT, for ∆FEV 1 and for ∆RV was met by 55%, 32% and 42%, respectively. For ∆6-MWT ≥ 26 m a lower baseline 6-MWT ( p = 0.0003) and a larger standard deviation (SD) of low attenuation cluster (LAC) sizes in peripheral regions of treated lung ( p = 0.0037) were significantly associated with positive outcome. For ∆FEV 1 ≥ 12%, lower baseline FEV 1 ( p = 0.02) and larger median LAC sizes in the central regions of treated lobe ( p = 0.0018) were significant predictors of good response. For ∆RV ≥ 10% a greater baseline TLC ( p = 0.0014) and a larger SD of LAC sizes in peripheral regions of treated lung ( p = 0.007) tended to respond better. Conclusion: Patients with lower FEV 1 and 6-MWT, with higher TLC and specific QCT characteristics responded more positively to LVRC treatment, suggesting a more targeted CT-based approach to patient selection could lead to greater efficacy in treatment response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kontogianni et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: