Key result
Low hospital volume was significantly associated with increased odds of developing a Patient Safety Indicator (OR 1.69) compared to high-volume hospitals among patients undergoing vascular surgery.
Why the study?
What are the determinants and rates of Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) in patients undergoing vascular surgery?
Observational (n=1,412,703)
Yes
What are the determinants and rates of Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) in patients undergoing vascular surgery?
Odds Ratio: 1.69 (95% CI 1.53–1.87)
p-value: p=<0.0001
Patient safety events in vascular surgery occur in approximately 5.2% of cases and vary significantly by procedure type, hospital volume, and patient demographics.
May inform targeted safety protocols at low-volume vascular centers; leaves open causal mechanisms and need for prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Patient safety is a national priority. Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) monitor potential adverse events during hospital stays. Surgical specialty PSI benchmarks do not exist, and are needed to account for differences in the range of procedures performed, reasons for the procedure, and differences in patient characteristics. A comprehensive profile of adverse events in vascular surgery was created. STUDY DESIGN: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried for 8 vascular procedures using ICD-9-CM codes from 2005 to 2009. Factors associated with PSI development were evaluated in univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 1,412,703 patients underwent a vascular procedure and a PSI developed in 5.2%. PSIs were more frequent in female, nonwhite patients with public payers (p < 0.01). Patients at mid and low-volume hospitals had greater odds of developing a PSI (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17; 95% CI, 1.10-1.23 and OR = 1.69; 95% CI, 1.53-1.87). Amputations had highest PSI risk-adjusted rate and carotid endarterectomy and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair had lower risk-adjusted rate (p < 0.0001). PSI risk-adjusted rate increased linearly by severity of patient indication: claudicants (OR = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.35-0.46), rest pain patients (OR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.69-0.90), ulcer (OR = 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.34), and gangrene patients (OR = 1.85; 95% CI, 1.66-2.06). CONCLUSIONS: Patient safety events in vascular surgery were high and varied by procedure, with amputations and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair having considerably more potential adverse events. PSIs were associated with black race, public payer, and procedure indication. It is important to note the overall higher rates of PSIs occurring in vascular patients and to adjust benchmarks for this surgical specialty appropriately.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hernandez‐Boussard et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Vascular surgery (n=1,412,703). Low hospital volume vs. High hospital volume was evaluated on Development of a Patient Safety Indicator (PSI) (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.53-1.87, p=<0.0001). Low hospital volume was significantly associated with increased odds of developing a Patient Safety Indicator (OR 1.69) compared to high-volume hospitals among patients undergoing vascular surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: