Second- and third-order, noncentered finite-difference schemes are described for the numerical solution of the hyperbolic equations of fluid dynamics. The advantages of noncentered methods over the more conventional centered schemes are: simpler programming logic, nonhomogeneous terms are easily included, and generalization to multidimensional problems is direct. Second- and third-order methods are compared with regard to dissipative and dispersive errors and shock-capturing ability. These schemes are then used in a shock-capturing technique to determine the inviscid, supersonic flow field surrounding space shuttle vehicles (SSV). Resulting flow fields about typical pointed and blunted, delta-winged SSVs at angle of attack are presented and compared with experiment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kutler et al. (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: