Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Modeling and experimental study reveals improved link gain accuracy using double-scatter models in short-range non-line-of-sight ultraviolet channels, highlighting efficient optical path planning.
Considering the scattering characteristics of wireless ultraviolet (UV) channels, the double-scatter assumption is revealed to well characterize the scattering-enhanced channel over a range of less than 100 m. Based on the cuboid scatterers with representative shapes, we present a ray-tracing algorithm under scattering enhancement conditions and give the probability density function of the free path in a non-uniform atmosphere. Then, we propose a semi-analytical (SA) link gain model with scattering enhancement, via generating a set of coordinates for a series of conical integral paths using a rotation matrix. On this basis, a one-dimensional integral expression for the single-scatter of the proposed SA link gain model is obtained, and the expression for the double-scatter is further derived. The link gain evaluation results show that the presence of scattering region can improve the received power of the non-line-of-sight UV system at a receiver. For all considered transceiver geometry, the results of the proposed SA model match well with the counterparts of Monte-Carlo (MC) based numerical calculation, with a gap of around 2 dB for both narrow and wide beam. In terms of computational efficiency, the execution time of the proposed SA model for the single-scatter and double-scatter is significantly reduced to 0.065% and 9.69% of those of the MC simulations, respectively. We further establish experiments using a fog-filled quartz cubic cavity in an outdoor environment to verify the correctness of the proposed model. The link gain from the numerical evaluation assuming double-scatter can improve the agreement with the experimental results by 1 dB compared with that of the single-scatter assumption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: