Key result
HIV infection in patients on stable ART with full viral suppression was not associated with decreased myocardial flow reserve compared to uninfected controls (73% vs 71% normal MFR; P=0.99).
Why the study?
Does HIV infection on stable ART affect myocardial flow reserve compared to HIV-uninfected controls?
Cross-Sectional (n=81)
Does HIV infection on stable ART affect myocardial flow reserve compared to HIV-uninfected controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 73% vs 71%
p-value: p=0.99
HIV-infected patients on stable ART with full viral suppression do not have decreased myocardial flow reserve compared to controls, though they exhibit slightly lower stress myocardial blood flow.
Studies have found HIV-infected patients to be at increased risk of myocardial infarction, which may be caused by coronary microvascular dysfunction. For the first time among HIV-infected patients, we assessed the myocardial flow reserve (MFR) by Rubidium-82 (82Rb) positron emission tomography (PET), which can quantify the coronary microvascular function. MFR has proved highly predictive of future coronary artery disease and cardiovascular events in the general population.In a prospective cross-sectional study, HIV-infected patients all receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) with full viral suppression and HIV-uninfected controls were scanned using 82Rb PET/computed tomography at rest and adenosine-induced stress, thereby obtaining the MFR (stress flow/rest flow), stratified into low ≤1.5, borderline >1.5 to 2.0, or normal >2.0.Fifty-six HIV-infected patients and 25 controls were included. The HIV-infected patients had a mean age of 53 years (range 37-68 years) with 23% active smokers. The controls had a mean age of 52 years (range 36-68 years) and 26% active smokers. In the HIV-infected group 73% had a normal MFR, 17% borderline, and 10% low values of MFR. Among controls these values were 71%, 19%, and 10%, respectively (P = 0.99). However, the HIV-infected group had lower values of stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) (2.63 ± 0.09 mL/g/min vs 2.99 ± 0.14 mL/g/min; P = 0.03). We found no evidence of decreased MFR as assessed by 82Rb PET among HIV-infected patients on stable ART with full viral suppression compared with HIV-uninfected controls. We did notice a decreased MBF during stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Knudsen et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in HIV infection (n=81). HIV infection on stable ART vs. HIV-uninfected controls was evaluated on Normal myocardial flow reserve (>2.0) (p=0.99). HIV infection in patients on stable ART with full viral suppression was not associated with decreased myocardial flow reserve compared to uninfected controls (73% vs 71% normal MFR; P=0.99).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: