Key result
Tissue engineered heart valves show promise in preclinical and early clinical testing as living valve substitutes, but significant challenges regarding immune response and durability must be overcome before widespread clinical use.
Why the study?
Current biological and mechanical heart valve substitutes have well-documented shortcomings, making translation of tissue engineering heart valves into large clinical scenarios an important challenge.
Tissue engineered heart valves offer a potential regenerative alternative to traditional prostheses, but translating preclinical and limited clinical success into widespread clinical use remains challenging.
Well documented shortcomings of current heart valve substitutes – biological and mechanical prostheses make them imperfect choices for patients diagnosed with heart valve disease, in need for a cardiac valve replacement. Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering represent the research grounds of the next generation of valvular prostheses – Tissue Engineering Heart Valves (TEHV). Mimicking the structure and function of the native valves, TEHVs are three dimensional structures obtained in laboratories encompassing scaffolds (natural and synthetic), cells (stem cells and differentiated cells) and bioreactors. The literature stipulates two major heart valve regeneration paradigms, differing in the manner of autologous cells repopulation of the scaffolds; in vitro , or in vivo , respectively. During the past two decades, multidisciplinary both in vitro and in vitro research work was performed and published. In vivo experience comprises preclinical tests in experimental animal model and cautious limited clinical translation in patients. Despite initial encouraging results, translation of their usage in large clinical scenarios represents the most important challenge that needs to be overcome. This review purpose is to outline the most remarkable preclinical and clinical results of TEHV evaluation along with the lessons learnt from all this experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simionescu et al. (2021) conducted a review in Heart valve disease. Tissue Engineering Heart Valves (TEHV) vs. Current heart valve substitutes (biological and mechanical prostheses) was evaluated. Tissue engineered heart valves show promise in preclinical and early clinical testing as living valve substitutes, but significant challenges regarding immune response and durability must be overcome before widespread clinical use.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: