Key result
Subject-specific multiscale modeling revealed that radial cell strains strongly correlated with organ-scale radial strains (R2=0.95), whereas circumferential cell strains showed no correlation.
Why the study?
To describe the aortic valve interstitial cells biomechanical milieu in physiological conditions, capturing the effect of subject-specific and leaflet-specific anatomical features from the organ to the cell scale.
A multiscale computational model of the aortic valve demonstrates that leaflet-specific anatomical features significantly influence biomechanical stress and strain down to the cellular level.
May guide valve cell biomechanics research; leaves open clinical translation and validation.
A Finite Element workflow for the multiscale analysis of the aortic valve biomechanics was developed and applied to three physiological anatomies with the aim of describing the aortic valve interstitial cells biomechanical milieu in physiological conditions, capturing the effect of subject-specific and leaflet-specific anatomical features from the organ down to the cell scale. A mixed approach was used to transfer organ-scale information down to the cell-scale. Displacement data from the organ model were used to impose kinematic boundary conditions to the tissue model, while stress data from the latter were used to impose loading boundary conditions to the cell level. Peak of radial leaflet strains was correlated with leaflet extent variability at the organ scale, while circumferential leaflet strains varied over a narrow range of values regardless of leaflet extent. The dependency of leaflet biomechanics on the leaflet-specific anatomy observed at the organ length-scale is reflected, and to some extent emphasized, into the results obtained at the lower length-scales. At the tissue length-scale, the peak diastolic circumferential and radial stresses computed in the fibrosa correlated with the leaflet surface area. At the cell length-scale, the difference between the strains in two main directions, and between the respective relationships with the specific leaflet anatomy, was even more evident; cell strains in the radial direction varied over a relatively wide range ([Formula: see text]) with a strong correlation with the organ length-scale radial strain ([Formula: see text]); conversely, circumferential cell strains spanned a very narrow range ([Formula: see text]) showing no correlation with the circumferential strain at the organ level ([Formula: see text]). Within the proposed simulation framework, being able to account for the actual anatomical features of the aortic valve leaflets allowed to gain insight into their effect on the structural mechanics of the leaflets at all length-scales, down to the cell scale.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rossini et al. (2021) studied Healthy aortic valve biomechanics (n=3). Subject-specific multiscale finite element modeling was evaluated on Correlation between cell length-scale strains and organ length-scale strains (R2 = 0.95, p=<0.0001). Subject-specific multiscale modeling revealed that radial cell strains strongly correlated with organ-scale radial strains (R2=0.95), whereas circumferential cell strains showed no correlation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: