Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Summary A test was undertaken of a system which predicts eucalypt plantation wood volume yields in Tasmania from a set of eight topographic, climatic and soil variables measured at a site. The system was tested in 32 plots located in plantations of E. globulus and E. nitens in northern Tasmania. When the system predicted that a site had high productivity (maximum mean annual increment ≤20 m3ha−1yr−1), there was a fairly high probability (≈80%) that the site indeed had that productivity. However, when it predicted lower productivity, it incorrectly predicted a substantial proportion of sites (≈50%) as being of lower productivity when they were in fact of high productivity. It was shown that, on average, the system underestimated productivity by 7%. In practice, the system could be used to predict average productivity over a region within a range bounded by -4% to +18% of the prediction (95% prediction interval). The system had a similar predictive ability to two other systems developed in Australia to estimate plantation productivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osler et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: