PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2008Tissue Engineering Part A117 citationsOpen Access

Differential Behavior of Auricular and Articular Chondrocytes in Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels

View Full Paper
CCCindy ChungIEIsaac E. EricksonRMRobert L. Mauck

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Chondrocytes isolated from a variety of sources, including auricular (AU) and articular (AR) cartilage, can differ in cell behavior, growth, and extracellular matrix (ECM) production, which can impact neocartilage properties in tissue engineering approaches. This behavior is also affected by the surrounding microenvironment, including soluble factors, biomaterials, and mechanical loading. The objective of this study was to investigate differences in juvenile AU and AR chondrocyte behavior when encapsulated in radically polymerized hyaluronic acid hydrogels. When implanted in vivo, differences in macroscopic appearance, mechanical properties, glycosaminoglycan content, and collagen content were observed depending on the chondrocyte type encapsulated. Specifically, AU constructs exhibited construct growth and neocartilage formation with increases in aggregate modulus and ECM accumulation with culture, whereas AR constructs retained their construct size and remained translucent with only a minimal increase in the compressive modulus. When cultured in vitro, both cell types remained viable and differences in gene expression were observed for type I and II collagens. Likewise, differences in gene expression were noted after dynamic mechanical loading, where stimulated AR constructs exhibited 2.3- and 1.5-fold increases in type II collagen and aggrecan over free-swelling controls, while AU samples exhibited smaller fold increases of 1.4- and 1.3-fold, respectively. Thus, these data indicate that the specific cell source, cell/material interactions, and loading environment are important in the final properties of tissue-engineered products.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chung et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a93e386bbea1c735e92c30dhttps://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2007.0291
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Influence of gel properties on neocartilage formation by auricular chondrocytes photoencapsulated in hyaluronic acid networks2006 · 148 citations
  2. 2Variations in the intrinsic mechanical properties of human articular cartilage with age, degeneration, and water content.1982 · 782 citations
  3. 3Photocrosslinkable polysaccharides forin situ hydrogel formation2000 · 471 citations
  4. 4Characterization of PicoGreen Reagent and Development of a Fluorescence-Based Solution Assay for Double-Stranded DNA Quantitation1997 · 790 citations
  5. 5Determination of hydroxyproline1967 · 1,591 citations