Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The influence of competing, similarly charged, inorganic ions on the size and charge behavior of suspended titanium-dioxide (nTiO(2)), silver (nAg) and fullerene (nC(60)) nanoparticles (NPs) was investigated. Under pH and ionic conditions similar to natural water bodies, Ca(2+) induced aggregation of nTiO(2) and nAg NPs more strongly than K(+) and Na(+). Although K(+) and Na(+) had a similar effect on aggregation, K(+) provided better screening of the particle surface charge presumably because of its small hydrated radius. These effects were decidedly more prominent for TiO(2) than Ag. Anions (co-ions), SO(4)(2-) and Cl(-), affected the surface charge behavior of nTiO(2) but not of nAg NPs. The zeta potential (ZP) of nTiO(2) NPs was more negative at higher SO(4)(2-)/Cl(-) ratios than lower. When Mg(2+) was the counterion, charge inversion and rapid aggregation of nC(60) NPs occurred under alkaline conditions, with a more pronounced effect for Cl(-) than SO(4)(2-). Response dissimilarities suggest fundamental differences in the interfacial-interaction characteristics of these NPs in the aquatic environment with corresponding differences in transport of these particles. Our study also shows the important role played by the iso-electric point pH (pH(iep)) of the NPs in determining their aggregation kinetics in the environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mukherjee et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: