Key result
Prophylactic doses of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) offer effective and safe protection against venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Why the study?
Ambulatory cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy face substantial venous thromboembolism risk, but guidelines recommend against routine low-molecular-weight heparins, prompting evaluation of direct oral anticoagulants.
Does prophylactic administration of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) prevent venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy?
Does prophylactic administration of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) prevent venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy?
Prophylactic low-dose DOACs are recommended as an effective and safe alternative to LMWHs for preventing VTE in ambulatory cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Risk stratification may guide VTE prophylaxis in ambulatory cancer patients on chemotherapy; leaves open prospective validation before routine use.
Ambulatory cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy are at a substantial risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) over the course of therapy and beyond it. Factors accounting for this risk include the activation of extrinsic and intrinsic coagulation pathways, platelet activation, impaired fibrinolysis, use of catheters, infusion of blood products, and thrombogenic potential of several chemotherapeutic drugs. A few stratification models can help identify patients at a higher risk of chemotherapy-associated VTE, who may benefit from preventive strategies. Although low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) effectively reduce the risk of VTE, current guidelines recommend against their routine use. Based on the results of recent randomized controlled clinical trials, the administration of prophylactic doses of the novel direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to ambulatory cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy has the potential to offer an effective and safe protection against VTE, obviating the inconveniences of heparins. Except for patients in whom the novel drugs are unsuitable or are contraindicated, in all other patients LMWHs should be replaced by low-dose DOACs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prandoni et al. (2021) conducted a review in Venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) was evaluated on Venous thromboembolism (VTE). Prophylactic doses of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) offer effective and safe protection against venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: