Copper ferrite (CuFe 2 O 4 ) possesses an indirect bandgap in the range of 1.54–1.95 eV. It is used as an attractive p -type photocathode in photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting, and theoretically it can yield a maximum photocurrent density of ∼27 mA/cm 2 and a maximum solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency of ∼33%. To date, only a few reports have been published on CuFe 2 O 4 photocathodes with very low-photocurrent densities, with a maximum value of 0.4 mA/cm 2 at 0.4 V vs RHE. Herein, we prepared a CuFe 2 O 4 photocathode on FTO glass with the sol–gel method followed by either high-temperature flame annealing or furnace annealing. We found that the flame-annealed CuFe 2 O 4 photocathode generated a photocurrent density of 1.82 mA/cm 2 at 0.4 V vs RHE that is approximately 3.5 times higher than the furnace-annealed CuFe 2 O 4 (0.52 mA/cm 2 ). This photocurrent density is also higher than those of all the reported CuFe 2 O 4 photocathodes, and any Cu containing ternary oxide (Cu–M–O, M: Fe, Bi, V, and Nb) photocathode (0.1–1.3 mA/cm 2 at 0.4 V vs RHE). An improved PEC performance of the flame-annealed CuFe 2 O 4 photocathode is elicited owing to the beneficial effects of flame annealing on the physical, optical, and electrical properties of CuFe 2 O 4 . Flame annealing enhances the light absorption property of the CuFe 2 O 4 photocathode by slightly reducing the bandgap, and by forming a thicker film with increased porosity. Flame annealing also reduces the oxygen vacancy concentration in CuFe 2 O 4, thus facilitating charge transport and interfacial charge transfer processes. Moreover, flame annealing requires only 16 min, which is much shorter than the time required for furnace annealing (∼9 h). These results demonstrate that flame annealing is a rapid and effective means for fabricating metal oxide photoelectrodes with an enhanced PEC water splitting performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: