Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two methods were used to evaluate bacterial recovery from beef, pork, and lamb adipose tissue. Higher counts were obtained with a tissue removal and fluid agitation technique (shaking) than with surface swabbing, but only when bacterial levels were low. Bacterial recovery by both methods was unaffected by specie origin of adipose tissue and differences in surface texture, sample storage time (12 versus 6 days), and duration fluid agitation (5 versus 10 min).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
BERRY et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: