Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mechanically deboned chicken meat (without skin) and chicken (with skin) were combined with 15 or 25% structured protein fiber (SPF) to subjectively and objectively evaluate the quality of patties. Proximate composition, water‐holding capacity, color, texture, and cooking loss were objectively determined. Products were characterized by the Quantitative Descriptive Analysis sensory technique. Raw patties containing 15% SPF had a higher water‐holding capacity than patties with 25% SPF. Cooked patties with 25% SPF required significantly more force to shear, exhibited higher cooking losses, and were characterized as more chewy and elastic, less moist, and more desirable than 15% SPF patties. Textural properties of patties containing mechanically deboned poultry meat were improved by adding 25% SPF; however, cook yield was greater for patties with 15% SPF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
LYON et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: