Theoretical study demonstrates an exact adaptivity ratio bound of q for hit-count inspection in hidden-set models, highlighting how feedback structures govern sequential search advantages.
We study a hidden-set problem in which perfect point queries acquire information but earn no reward, while a separate exact-q terminal action earns its hit count. Every instance satisfies V_ad^# <= q V_batch^#; taking the supremum over all depths and finite positive-batch instances at fixed q gives q. For q >= 2 and I >= 1, a staircase has ratio at least q/(1+2q/I) and approaches q as depth and ground size grow. The worst-case additive gap tends to q-1; at depth two, a four-state prior attains the sharp gap q(q-1)/[2(2q-1)]. Under one-hit reward, adaptivity instead collapses: a prior-free pointwise compilation makes all policy classes equal weighted maximum (I+q)-coverage. For hit count, the batch objective is not generally submodular, while a coverage proxy gives a (1-1/e)/q approximation. By contrast, reward-bearing active search admits ratios that grow with feedback-batch size. A two-round q=1 witness exhibits one mechanism by which public reward feedback restores adaptivity in multiday social deduction. Lean checks the finite identities and constructions listed in the verification ledger.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2026 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: