Critical review shows compatibility between Aristotelian character education and liberal democracy in schools, highlighting that practical wisdom fundamentally relies on intellectual autonomy.
The thesis of Benjamin Miller’s Against Aristotelian Character Education is that liberal democracy and government-sponsored Aristotelian Character Education (ACE) are incompatible. The central argument is that: (1) liberal democratic respect for free and equal citizenship precludes government-sponsored education that imposes a conception of a good life that is at odds with other reasonable conceptions of a good life; (2) government-sponsored ACE would impose a conception of a good life that is at odds with other reasonable conceptions of a good life. This review accepts the first of these premises but disputes the second. It argues that: (a) coercive imposition of Aristotle’s conception of a good life would be inconsistent with the value Aristotle assigns to intellectual autonomy; (b) Aristotle did not conceive of the ethical knowledge that is essential to practical wisdom and genuine virtue as something that could or would be coercively imposed; (c) there are reasons to regard common schooling, promotion of flourishing, and disciplinary and inquiry-based practical wisdom as defining strengths of ACE within a liberal-democratic framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Randall Curren (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: