Spatial modeling study reveals distinct devegetation buffers around urban infrastructure, indicating cumulative ecological pressure shifts over time.
Infrastructure development increasingly pressures vegetation and natural ecosystems. However, traditional buffer zones focus on protecting natural cores rather than addressing infrastructure as a pressure source. This study introduces a distance-decay framework for mapping Conservation Buffer against Devegetation (CBD), which defines buffer boundaries based on actual vegetation response to distance from human infrastructure. Using a two-module approach, we integrated high-resolution Google Earth imagery with spatial analysis of land-use change. Module 1 employed Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification, which outperformed Maximum Likelihood Classification. Module 2 calculated CBD by applying a 2% stability threshold to devegetation rates across concentric distance rings. The framework was applied in Maragheh, Iran, where Yadegaran Park (established in 2013) and a 65-m bridge (2018) were constructed within orchard areas along the Sufichay River. Results revealed CBD of 750 m for the park and 550 m for the bridge, demonstrating differential impacts of patch versus linear infrastructure. Base devegetation rate increased from 14% (2011–2017) to 18% (2017–2024) ( p < 0.0001), indicating cumulative pressure intensification. Vegetation vulnerability patterns shifted: grasslands experienced highest loss (38.4%) in the first period, while shrubs became most vulnerable (27.5%) in the second. This freely available data framework offers an effective tool for evidence-based land-use planning and environmental impact assessment in data-limited regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asaad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: