Experimental study reveals high-accuracy identification of cashmere and modified wool using a morphology-prior fusion network, suggesting enhanced authenticity verification in textiles.
Scale-removal and surface-smoothing treatments weaken the distinctive cuticle structures of wool fibers, including scale edges, surface roughness, and boundary fluctuations. As a result, modified wool exhibits an intermediate scanning electron microscopy (SEM) morphology between natural wool and cashmere, which obscures decision boundaries and reduces interclass separability in image-based classification. To address this ambiguity, we propose an improved MobileNetV3-Large framework that combines morphology-guided representation and discriminative feature refinement. Explicit morphological descriptors are extracted to preserve weakened cuticle-related cues, while MobileNetV3-Large learns deep texture representations from SEM images. To make the deep representation more consistent with subtle morphological differences, a discrimination aware mechanism (DAM) first filters ambiguous convolutional responses using class-proxy guidance, and cross-modal attention (CMA) then uses the retained discriminative features to guide the fusion of complementary morphological descriptors. This design enhances category separation among cashmere, wool, and modified wool. Experiments on a self-constructed SEM image dataset yielded 98.52% accuracy for the fusion model, surpassing baseline MobileNetV3-Large by 5.56%. These results affirm the fusion model's superior performance and the feature integration strategy's role in bolstering discriminability for fiber identification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: